Pengusiran Pengungsi Rohingya Di Aceh: Tinjauan Hukum Internasional Dan Tantangan Hak Asasi Manusia
Main Article Content
Abstract
Krisis pengungsi Rohingya telah menjadi salah satu tantangan kemanusiaan yang signifikan di Kawasan Asia Tenggara, termasuk di Indonesia. Artikel ini membahas fenomena pengusiran pengungsi Rohingya di Aceh melalui perspektif hukum internasional dan hak asasi manusia. dengan menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normative, artikel ini mengevaluasi kepatuhan Indonesia terhadap kewajiban internasional, khususnya Konvensi Pengungsi 1951 dan prinsip non-refoulement, yang melarang pengembalian paksa pengungsi ke negara asal di mana mereka terancam bahaya. Selain itu, analisis juga difokuskan pada tantangan hak asasi manusia yang dihadapi oleh pengungsi Rohingya di Aceh, termasuk akses terhadap perlindungan hukum dan hak-hak dasar. Temuan penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa meskipun Indonesia bukan negara pihak dalam Konvensi Pengungsi 1951, kewajiban kemanusiaan dan perlindungan hak asasi manusia tetap relevan dalam krisis pengungsi ini.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Adwani, Adwani, Rosmawati Rosmawati, and M. Ya’kub Aiyub Kadir. “The Responsibility in Protecting the Rohingya Refugees in Aceh Province, Indonesia: An International Refugees Law Perspective.” IIUM Law Journal 29, no. (S2) (2021): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v29i(s2).677.
Afriansyah, Arie, Hadi Rahmat Purnama, and Akbar Kurnia Putra. “Asylum Seekers and Refugee Management: (Im) Balance Burden Sharing Case between Indonesia and Australia.” Sriwijaya Law Review 6, no. 1 (2022): 70–100. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol6.Iss1.1145.pp70-100.
Ahmed, Arif. “Individual Protection versus National Security: A Balancing Test Concerning the Principle of Non-Refoulement.” IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS) 21, no. 5 (2016): 30–40. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2105053040.
Coleman, Nils. “Non-Refoulement Revised Renewed Review of the Status of the Principle of Non-Refoulement as Customary International Law.” European Journal of Migration and Law 5 (2003): 23–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/157181603100405657.
Dedi. “Sederet Aksi Kriminal Imigran Rohingya Di Aceh, Dari Narkoba Hingga Perkosa Anak Di Bawah Umur.” Viva.Co.Id, 2024. https://www.viva.co.id/trending/1664361-sederet-aksi-kriminal-imigran-rohingya-di-aceh-dari-narkoba-hingga-perkosa-anak-di-bawah-umur.%0A%0A.
Ernawati, Ninin. “The Legal Consequences of the Application of Two Australian Policies as Members of the 1951 Refugee Convention Reviewed from the VCLT 1969.” Jurnal IUS 7, no. 1 (2019).
Fitriyadi, A. A., & Latukau, F. “Diferensiasi Pengungsi Dan Pencari Suaka Dalam Hukum Pengungsi Internasional Dan Hubungannya Dengan Prinsip Non-Refoulement.” Jambura Law Review 2, no. 2 (2020): 120–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v2i2.5400.
Havez, Muhammad, Ninin Ernawati, Diva Pitaloka, Ahmad Rosidi, and Joko Jumadi. “Balancing Local Community Interest and International Responsibilities in the Context of the Expulsion of Rohingya Refugees in Aceh.” Indonesian Journal of International Law 21, no. 4 (2024): 655–84. https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol21.4.1823.
Howie, Emily. “Sri Lankan Boat Migration to Australia: Motivations and Dilemmas.” Economic and Political Weekly 48, no. 35 (2013): 97–104. https://doi.org/http://www.jstor.org/stable/23528760.
Kim, Seunghwan. “Non-Refoulement and Extraterritorial Jurisdiction: State Sovereignty and Migration Controls at Sea in the European Context.” Leiden Journal of International Law 30, no. 1 (2017): 49–70. https://doi.org/doi:10.1017/S0922156516000625.
Kneebone, Susan, Antje Missbach, and Balawyn Jones. “The False Promise of Presidential Regulation No. 125 of 2016?” Asian Journal of Law and Society 8, no. 3 (2021): 431–50. https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2021.2.
Novianti, N. “Implementasi Perpres No. 125 Tahun 2016 Tentang Penanganan Pengungsi Dari Luar Negeri (The Implementation of Presidential Regulation Number 125 of 2016 on the Handling of International Refugees).” Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan 10, no. 2 (2020): 259–80. https://doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v10i2.1343.
Putri, E. A., Wahyuni, W. S., Syaputra, M. Y. A., Paramesvari, A. J., & Pratama, G. A. “Legal Protection of Rohingya Citizens Related to The Conflict in Myanmar.” Jambura Law Review Law Review 5, no. 1 (2023): 60–75. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v5i1.16722.
Sari, Desi Ratna, et al. “Analisis Kebijakan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Era Kepemimpinan Presiden Joko Widodo.” Puteri Hijau: Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah 8, no. 1 (2023): 125–34. https://doi.org/10.24114/ph.v8i1. 44408.
Shalihah, Fithriatus, and Muhammad Nur. “Observations on the Protection of Refugees in Indonesia.” Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 15, no. 4 (2021): 361–84. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v15no4.2143.
Supaat, Dina Imam. “Escaping the Principle of Non-Refoulement.” International Journal of Business, Economics and Law 2, no. 3 (2013): 86–97. https://doi.org/https://www.ijbel.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Escaping-The-Principle-Of-Non-Refoulement-Dina-Imam-Supaat.pdf.
Syahrin, M. Alvi. “The Implementation of Non-Refoulement Principle to the Asylum Seekers and Refugees in Indonesia.” Sriwijaya Law Review 1, no. 2 (2017): 168–78.
Taufik Akbar, S.IP., M.A.*) dan Riski Dwijayanti, S.E., MGPP. “Upaya Penanganan Pengungsi Luar Negeri Di Indonesia.” sekretariat kabinet republik indonesia, 2022. https://setkab.go.id/upaya-penanganan-pengungsi-luar-negeri-di-indonesia/.
Trevisanut, Seline. “The Principle of Non-Refoulement and the de-Territorialization of Border Control at Sea.” Leiden Journal of International Law 27, no. 3 (2014): 661–75. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156514000259.
Zetter, Roger, and Héloïse Ruaudel. “Refugees’ Right to Work and Access to Labour Markets: Constraints, Challenges and Ways Forward.” Forced Migration Review 58, no. June (2018): 4–7. www.fmreview.org/economies.